The gist of the argument is that we relate to God through a tiny expectancy gap—to which, in the momentary absence of an image, we tend, probabilistically speaking, toward the weightless infinitude of our own nonexistence—with this regression releasing the energy needed for creating or sustaining an image. However, the logic is sound only if infinity and/or God has been encoded within neural design—this being the only way to explain how a regression relative to infinity can precisely channel energy into an image, the expectable and finite nature of which thwarts the Second Law of Thermodynamics. It is then but a quick skip and hop to explaining how, apart from an image, the equation E = mc2 is meaningless.
of the Invisible God?
therefore, E = mc2
is full of meaning.
Four excepts from the book support this:
Sincerely yours in Jesus through Mary,
Become like Jesus
Live for the Triune God
Seek the Light of Our Lord Jesus Christ
See you on the High Ground!
* - J.M.J. + O.B.T. + M.G.R. stands for:
Jesus, Mary and Joseph;
O Beata Trinitas;
St. Michael, St. Gabriel and St. Raphael